🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a reassessment. Over the years, an event that was initiated as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate functions where Black people are remunerated to speak with Caucasian groups about hidden biases and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. But even that moment has passed. The wave has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month developed from this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The month has developed since its inception, focusing less on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the way the observance is celebrated is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it develops is a valuable example in how co-option leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a legislator feels emboldened to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. At the same time, far-right parties are surging in Europe as a complete entity.

In the US, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the country. A effort to remove African American heritage and narrative from the archives is under way. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the celebration represents how insufficiently it can be influential if it is limited to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the situation of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. Denise Miller, a educator at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a urge to just discontinue events including Black History Month completely, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an period that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an foundation that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out across all seasons (as certain organizations are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) included in educational programs. It would also be a era that does not shy away from governmental matters, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves mere awareness of the history when it fails to address the present reality of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Establishments who mark it should not be comforted with the passive language of implicit prejudice and awareness of “microaggressions”, but faced with the dangers that affect everyone if anti-racism is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and reactive. Maybe an complete renaming is required – Black History is Now Month.